A simple guide to how different student assignment policies affect transport routes and vehicle requirements.
This model simulates a rural landscape with village communities, outlying homes, and local secondary schools. It maps exactly how pupils get from their homes to school and groups them into transport options (buses, minibuses, or taxis) based on different policies.
The key question it answers: Does splitting up school routes make transport more messy and more expensive?
Historically, school transport has been based on Catchment Areas (local school boundaries). Under this rule, all children living in the same village or community are assigned to the same local secondary school.
Because students in a village travel to the same school, they can be pooled into shared, high-capacity buses, which generally represents a cost-efficient use of vehicles.
Under this policy, eligibility for free transport is determined strictly by the closest school to a child's household.
Since households within a single village are geographically distributed, the closest school can vary between properties, causing students from the same community to be assigned to different schools.
When student cohorts are divided across multiple destinations:
The simulator maps a virtual rural area and calculates exactly how many buses, minibuses, and taxis are needed under both rules.