School Transport Action Group
← Scrutiny Hub
STAG Policy Scrutiny Briefing • Evaluation Series
REF: NY-STAG-2026-MODEL
Operational Audit Model Evaluation

EVALUATION OF THE STAG OPERATIONAL MODEL

A Critical Evaluation of the Proposed Changes to North Yorkshire Council’s Home to School Travel Policy: Examining the STAG Operational Audit Model, Symmetrical Phasing, and Negative Fleet Gearing.

TL;DR • Core Briefing Points
1. Context & Foundational Modelling Principles

Following North Yorkshire Council’s resolution on 24 July 2024 to abolish discretionary catchment-based travel in favour of nearest-school entitlement, official forecasts treated the policy shift as a frictionless administrative exercise. The School Transport Action Group (STAG) developed an independent financial audit model to stress-test the authority’s numbers against the physical realities of rural transport operations.

The model is architected around four foundational principles:

2. Deconstruction of Core Operational Friction

Official council modelling assumed linear cash deductions: when a pupil loses eligibility, their cost disappears from the ledger. The STAG model proves that gross savings do not translate into net reductions due to three operational friction mechanisms:

2.1. Mechanism 1: The Rolling Cohort Stack (Statutory Phasing)

Under statutory guidance, local authorities cannot retrospectively strip transport from pupils already midway through their secondary education. The policy applies only to new Year 7 admissions.

This structural lag means existing bus contracts must remain operational for legacy cohorts while new bespoke vehicles are commissioned concurrently for younger siblings travelling in different directions.

2.2. Mechanism 2: Route Fracturing & Geographic Partitioning

North Yorkshire covers over 3,200 square miles. Displaced pupils cannot be aggregated into a single hypothetical coach without creating 2-hour journeys that breach statutory travel limits. The STAG model breaks the displaced population across 50 rural feeder zones:

The Negative Gearing Penalty: Cancelling a single £500/day commercial coach carrying 50 pupils is financially wiped out if route fragmentation forces the Council to commission just four contracted taxis at £150/day (£600/day).
2.3. Mechanism 3: The Chained Dispute Resolution Funnel

The Council budgeted virtually nothing for parental appeals. In reality, withdrawing travel rights triggers a multi-stage statutory appeal progression:

3. Financial Outputs & 7-Year Budget Trajectory

Evaluating the STAG model under baseline settings (190 school days per year; framework contract rates of £150/day for taxis, £250/day for minibuses, and £500/day for coaches) produces the following multi-year trajectory:

Year Academic Timeline Council Claimed Savings STAG Projected Costs Net Annual Budget Position Cumulative Net Balance
Year 1 2025/26 £840,800 £1,029,524 −£188,724 −£188,724
Year 2 2026/27 £1,594,191 £1,998,524 −£404,333 −£593,056
Year 3 2027/28 £2,390,050 £2,967,524 −£577,474 −£1,170,530
Year 4 2028/29 £3,146,036 £3,936,524 −£790,488 −£1,961,017
Year 5 2029/30 £3,586,200 £4,905,524 −£1,319,324 −£3,280,341
Year 6 2030/31 £4,026,363 £4,905,524 −£879,161 −£4,159,501
Year 7 2031/32 £4,263,445 £4,905,524 −£642,079 −£4,801,580
7-Year Total 2025–2032 £19,847,085 £24,648,665 −£4,801,580 (Deficit) −£4,801,580
7-Year Cost Composition Breakdown
Cost Component 7-Year Expenditure (£) % of Total Operational Delivery Cost
Replacement Vehicle Fleet (Taxis, Minibuses, Coaches) £24,225,000 98.28%
Parental Appeals Casework (Stages 1, 2, and 3) £213,665 0.87%
Ongoing System Administration & GIS Licensing £210,000 0.85%
Total Operational Delivery Costs £24,648,665 100.00%
4. Methodological Strengths & Limitations
4.1. Comparative Strengths Over Council Models
4.2. Analytical Limitations & Moderating Factors

To maintain analytical objectivity, the model adopts simplifying conventions that warrant balanced interpretation:

5. Scrutiny Verdict

The STAG Operational Audit Model provides a necessary and methodologically sound audit of North Yorkshire Council’s Home to School Travel Policy.

Where official council models relied on gross savings abstractions—assuming frictionless fleet reductions, zero replacement vehicles, and minimal dispute overheads—the STAG model establishes a dual-sided appraisal grounded in the legal constraints of the Education Act 1996 and the procurement economics of rural transport.

Summary

The council changed a transport policy with no transport input. Our operational model demonstrates that when real-world vehicle step-costs, rural route fracturing, and statutory cohort protections are included, the policy generates a 7-year cumulative deficit of −£4.80m instead of the promised savings.

Full Council approved this objectively bad policy decision underpinned by flawed evidence, aspirational assumptions, and zero contract savings. Remember: the council represents you, their constituents.

Launch Interactive Financial Model → ← Return to Checking the Numbers